acatcalledanarchy wrote:http://www.trademarkia.com/minitaur-85435534.html - this..?
If it's indeed a "Minitaur", then it's a Taurus III RME for sure. Especially with a name like that.
acatcalledanarchy wrote:http://www.trademarkia.com/minitaur-85435534.html - this..?
Well, the RME could be justifiable by adding more hardware options to it. Modular, you nay be right about that. And a 4-voice Taurus poly synth...superd2112 wrote:I could be wrong, but I just don't think there's a big enough market to justify building a RME Taurus. I also don't think Moog would do another mono synth, and a modular would most likely be cost-prohibitive to build (and costly to buy), so I'm betting it's a 4-voice poly synth, based on the Taurus.
latigid on wrote:Could be a Taurus App
</wet towel>
**EDIT: IT APPEARS ALOT OF THEIR TRADEMARKS USE THE SAME DESCRIPTION, SO DISREGARD MY FIRST PARAGRAPH BELOW:Kenneth wrote:If you follow the link regarding the "Minitaur" that was posted earlier, and do some reading, you'll find this is what information is provided:
MINITAUR Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Sound frequency filters for controlling audio parameters by raising or lowering the gain of specific audio frequencies using a resonant filter
IC 015. US 002 021 036. G & S: Electronic musical keyboards; music synthesizers
Not sure what this means, but it sure is exciting
Looking at their other Trademarks, you are correct. Disregard my above speculation (except it still seems like it will be related to the Taurus).EricK wrote:No, I think the trademark description is just a general description to satisfy the filing officers paperwork without giving away what the actual item is. They are trademarking a Name, nothing else. This has been the same description for the murf, the slim phatty and will continue as they move forward....as long as they keep trademarking names.